<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Are you happy you have been heard by MOE...]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>to differentiate citizens and non-citizens?<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.edvantage.com.sg/edvantage/news/schoolnews/1173770/School_fees_to_increase_for_non_citizens_in_2013_MOE.html">http://www.edvantage.com.sg/edvantage/news/schoolnews/1173770/School_fees_to_increase_for_non_citizens_in_2013_MOE.html</a><br /><br /><b><b>School fees to increase for non-citizens in 2013: MOE</b></b><br />Edvantage | Tue Jun 26 2012<br /><br /><br />SINGAPORE - The Ministry of Education (MOE) announced today that it will be revising school fees from 2013 in government and government-aided schools for non-Singaporeans.<br /><br />School fees will increase by $50-80 per month for students who are Permanent Residents (PR) and by $115-250 per month for international students (IS).<br /><br />Primary PR students will be charged $90 up from $40, while IS (ASEAN) will be charged $350 up from $235. Other international students will be charged $500 up from $345.<br /><br />School fees for students who are Singapore Citizens (SC) will remain unchanged. Primary school education is free for citizens.<br /><br />Monthly fees for secondary PR students, IS (ASEAN) and IS will increase by $65 to $120, $125 to $450, and $180 to $650, respectively.<br /><br />Fees for local students will remain at $5.<br /><br />Meanwhile, pre-university PR students will be charged $160 up from $80, while IS (ASEAN) will be charged $700 up from $530. Other international students will be charged $1,000 up from $750.<br /><br />School fees for local students will remain at $6.<br /><br />Monthly standard miscellaneous fees will also increase for all students by $1 to $6.50 for primary school students, by $2.00 to $10.00 for secondary school students and by $2.50 to $13.50 for Pre-University school students.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/37183/are-you-happy-you-have-been-heard-by-moe</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:10:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/37183.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:31:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:22:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>ksi:</b><p>Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br /><br />...<b><b>Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs chose not to complete their duty.</b></b><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote>Thanks for the update, ksi!<br /><br />I don't quite understand what is meant by the sentence in bold above. :scratchhead:<p></p></blockquote>It is indeed interesting to report this point since they are doing it by choice.  I believe the bottom line is Dr Ng wants to make his stand firm that there is no 2-ways about the NS policy.  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":wink:" alt="😉" /><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/788291</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/788291</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[corneyAmber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:22:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 02:30:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>verykiasu2010:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>tigermum:</b><p>his son may not be able to change citizenship because singapore does not allow dual citizenship and he needs to renounce his singapore citizenship before he is allowed to take up another citizenship.  his new host country may not bother whether he renounces his singapore citizenship or not, but singapore won't allow.  the moment he steps into singapore embassy overseas, he will be told he can't renounce unless and until he serves his ns.   at the end, he just remain stateless</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Do u mean that he cannot renounce his citizenship at the age of 21?<p></p></blockquote>if the new host country need to see proof of renunciation of previous citizenship and if he has not served ns, even above age 21, when he goes to any singapore embassy to renounce, he will not be accepted[/quote]<br /><br />So that is to say he 'born as Singaporean, die as Singaporean', at any age also cannot denounce unless do NS? So this 'you can choose your citizenship when you grow up' is not true (in relation to foreign spouse) because Singapore has this NS attached to it.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787944</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787944</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tigermum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 02:30:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:40:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><p>[quote=\"ksi\"]Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br /><br />...<b><b>Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs <span style="\&quot;color:"><span style="\&quot;font-size:">chose </span></span>not to complete their duty.</b></b><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote>Thanks for the update, ksi!<br /><br />I don't quite understand what is meant by the sentence in bold above. :scratchhead:<p></p></blockquote>Highlighted for you.. it means, the <b><b>ungrateful </b></b>sons CHOSE to be separated from their parents..[/quote]OH!   :slapshead:  :sad:<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787908</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[concern2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:40:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:23:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>ksi:</b><p>Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br /><br />...<b><b>Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs <span style="\&quot;color:"><span style="\&quot;font-size:">chose </span></span>not to complete their duty.</b></b><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote>Thanks for the update, ksi!<br /><br />I don't quite understand what is meant by the sentence in bold above. :scratchhead:<p></p></blockquote>Highlighted for you.. it means, the <b><b>ungrateful </b></b>sons CHOSE to be separated from their parents..<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787895</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787895</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[limlim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:23:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:08:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ksi:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br /><br />...<b><b>Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs chose not to complete their duty.</b></b><br /></blockquote></blockquote>Thanks for the update, ksi!<br /><br />I don't quite understand what is meant by the sentence in bold above. :scratchhead:<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787881</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787881</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[concern2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:08:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:47:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ksi:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br />AsiaOne<br />Sunday, Jul 01, 2012<br /><br />SINGAPORE - Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen reiterated that sons of permanent residents (PRs) have to complete national service (NS) in order to keep PR status.<br /><br />Speaking to the Straits Times, Minister Ng said that first-generation PRs are exempted from NS, but have to be aware that their sons have to complete the duty if they apply for PR status for their children.<br />RELATED STORIES<br /><br />    8,800 PRs served NS over the last five years<br />    NS a contentious point between foreign- and local-born citizens<br />    4,200 males gave up Singapore PR status in last 5 years<br /><br />\"The basic message to permanent residents is this: If you want to take up permanent residency for your children, please do so recognizing that they have to do NS as a duty and there will be a course if you don't.<br /><br />\"So, it's better not to take up PR if your children are not going to do NS,\" he said.<br /><br /><span style="color:#FF0000">Addressing concerns about NS-liable PRs renouncing their residency before serving NS, Dr Ng added that second-generation PRs face harsh penalties if they choose not to fulfill their two years and give up their PR status.<br /></span><br />Minister Ng's comments come as an ongoing debate takes place about the need for more punitive measures to make second-generation PRs serve the military stint, including imposing a security bond on their parents, to be forfeited if the sons do not go through NS.<br /><br />Dr Ng said that current measures in place are already harsher than that.<br /><br />According to RazorTV, 8,800 male foreigners who became PRs under the sponsorship of their parents over the last five years enlisted in NS.<br /><br />However, another 4,200 renounced their PR status prior to serving NS.<br /><br /><span style="\&quot;color:">According to Colonel Kenneth Liow, second-generation PRs' failure to serve NS will be taken into account when they apply to study or work in Singapore in the future, said in a letter to The Straits Times forum.</span><br /><br />Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs chose not to complete their duty.<br /><br /><span style="\&quot;color:">Dr Ng, however, pointed out that Singapore has to enforce the NS policy to send a clear signal that NS duty must be fulfilled, despite the difficulties.</span></blockquote></blockquote>it seems like they will not approve their student pass or work permit ..... since you don't want to stay permanently here, why need long term pass to study or work here, right ?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[verykiasu2010]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:47:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm....this is the latest news from the Defence minister clarifying on the PR's sons' NS status, they heard our confusion over this....  :evil: <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html">http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120701-356519.html</a><br /><br />AsiaOne<br />Sunday, Jul 01, 2012<br /><br />SINGAPORE - Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen reiterated that sons of permanent residents (PRs) have to complete national service (NS) in order to keep PR status.<br /><br />Speaking to the Straits Times, Minister Ng said that first-generation PRs are exempted from NS, but have to be aware that their sons have to complete the duty if they apply for PR status for their children.<br />RELATED STORIES<br /><br />    8,800 PRs served NS over the last five years<br />    NS a contentious point between foreign- and local-born citizens<br />    4,200 males gave up Singapore PR status in last 5 years<br /><br />\"The basic message to permanent residents is this: If you want to take up permanent residency for your children, please do so recognizing that they have to do NS as a duty and there will be a course if you don't.<br /><br />\"So, it's better not to take up PR if your children are not going to do NS,\" he said.<br /><br /><span style="color:#FF0000">Addressing concerns about NS-liable PRs renouncing their residency before serving NS, Dr Ng added that second-generation PRs face harsh penalties if they choose not to fulfill their two years and give up their PR status.<br /></span><br />Minister Ng's comments come as an ongoing debate takes place about the need for more punitive measures to make second-generation PRs serve the military stint, including imposing a security bond on their parents, to be forfeited if the sons do not go through NS.<br /><br />Dr Ng said that current measures in place are already harsher than that.<br /><br />According to RazorTV, 8,800 male foreigners who became PRs under the sponsorship of their parents over the last five years enlisted in NS.<br /><br />However, another 4,200 renounced their PR status prior to serving NS.<br /><br /><span style="\&quot;color:">According to Colonel Kenneth Liow, second-generation PRs' failure to serve NS will be taken into account when they apply to study or work in Singapore in the future, said in a letter to The Straits Times forum.</span><br /><br />Minister Ng also said that he received letter letters from families who say they have been separated because NS-liable PRs chose not to complete their duty.<br /><br /><span style="\&quot;color:">Dr Ng, however, pointed out that Singapore has to enforce the NS policy to send a clear signal that NS duty must be fulfilled, despite the difficulties.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[corneyAmber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:38:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>tigermum:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">his son may not be able to change citizenship because singapore does not allow dual citizenship and he needs to renounce his singapore citizenship before he is allowed to take up another citizenship.  his new host country may not bother whether he renounces his singapore citizenship or not, but singapore won't allow.  the moment he steps into singapore embassy overseas, he will be told he can't renounce unless and until he serves his ns.   at the end, he just remain stateless</blockquote></blockquote><br />Do u mean that he cannot renounce his citizenship at the age of 21?[/quote]<br /><br />if the new host country need to see proof of renunciation of previous citizenship and if he has not served ns, even above age 21, when he goes to any singapore embassy to renounce, he will not be accepted<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[verykiasu2010]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:38:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:34:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Steadyberry:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">According to his father as long as his ds stays away fr sg, he is fine. He has settled down in nz, has a job and can stay in nz forever since he has chg his citizenship. Dun think he informed sg embassy formally n the new host country wont bother to chk since nz allows dual citizenship. After so many yrs, his sg passport should hv expired by now n he needs to get his NZ PR transferred to a new passport. Sg embassy won't issue him a new passport and continue to let him \"hide\" in nz. So pretty sure he has applied for a nz passport. sg citizen or sg PR, staying in sg or overseas, u will need to serve ns for sure.</blockquote></blockquote><br />He is most likely holding a NZ passport and he can travel round the world but has to avoid landing in SG, in case get caught for defaulting NS.<br /><br />The same happens with Malaysians in NZ ..... they just keep quite and just use the NZ passport and they can enter M'sia, but they have no NS regulations to catch them<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[verykiasu2010]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:34:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:40:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">According to his father as long as his ds stays away fr sg, he is fine. He has settled down in nz, has a job and can stay in nz forever since he has chg his citizenship. Dun think he informed sg embassy formally n the new host country wont bother to chk since nz allows dual citizenship. After so many yrs, his sg passport should hv expired by now n he needs to get his NZ PR transferred to a new passport. Sg embassy won’t issue him a new passport and continue to let him "hide" in nz. So pretty sure he has applied for a nz passport. sg citizen or sg PR, staying in sg or overseas, u will need to serve ns for sure.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steadyberry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:40:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:23:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">his son may not be able to change citizenship because singapore does not allow dual citizenship and he needs to renounce his singapore citizenship before he is allowed to take up another citizenship.  his new host country may not bother whether he renounces his singapore citizenship or not, but singapore won’t allow.  the moment he steps into singapore embassy overseas, he will be told he can’t renounce unless and until he serves his ns.   at the end, he just remain stateless[/quote]<br /><br /><br />Do u mean that he cannot renounce his citizenship at the age of 21?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787675</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787675</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tigermum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:23:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:45:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Steadyberry:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>verykiasu2010:</b><p>[quote=\"concern2\"]<br /><br />Does this mean that the son of a parent with a Singapore PR status, even if he is living in other countries (e.g. US), has to come back at the age of 16 to register for NS?</p></blockquote></blockquote>if the son of the SGP PR is also a PR, this PR son (born in SGP) must come back to SGP to serve NS regardless where he stays.  By law. No excuse<p></p></blockquote>fyi. I know one singaporean family moved to nz many yrs ago when ds n dd in pri sch. Both children r now working adults. The whole family except ds visits sg almost every yr.  The father told my parents that his ds will be caught if his ds returns to sg for skipping ns. Even transit in sg is not allowed. Not sure did the family chg their citizenship but am sure his son did.[/quote]his son may not be able to change citizenship because singapore does not allow dual citizenship and he needs to renounce his singapore citizenship before he is allowed to take up another citizenship.  his new host country may not bother whether he renounces his singapore citizenship or not, but singapore won't allow.  the moment he steps into singapore embassy overseas, he will be told he can't renounce unless and until he serves his ns.   at the end, he just remain stateless<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787615</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787615</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[verykiasu2010]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:45:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:37:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>nansk:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><p><br />The point is just that the PR boy is fully capable of depriving another citizen of a place in the Pri Sch.</p></blockquote></blockquote>That is an odd thought. PRs are long-term residents in Sg; 5-10 years at the very least. They work, pay taxes, contribute to keep the economy running. The idea that they are 'depriving' a citizen of anything is narrow-minded and unfair.<br /><br />In any case, this thread has gone way off-topic. I am not going to participate in this discussion anymore. Whatever your thoughts are on this matter, please keep them to yourself.<p></p></blockquote>I am just stating a fact. Whether it is to be viewed in good or bad light is up to the reader.<br /><br />Sure, PRs (those not attached to citizen) come where work, pay taxes.. and of coz contribute to the overcrowding in public transports and also compete with citizens for jobs..<br /><br />Oh well. if you are not interested in a reply, you should not have questioned a remark/post.<br /><br />And leave it as it is..<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787565</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787565</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[limlim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:37:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:44:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>verykiasu2010:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><p><br /><br />Does this mean that the son of a parent with a Singapore PR status, even if he is living in other countries (e.g. US), has to come back at the age of 16 to register for NS?</p></blockquote></blockquote>if the son of the SGP PR is also a PR, this PR son (born in SGP) must come back to SGP to serve NS regardless where he stays.  By law. No excuse<p></p></blockquote>fyi. I know one singaporean family moved to nz many yrs ago when ds n dd in pri sch. Both children r now working adults. The whole family except ds visits sg almost every yr.  The father told my parents that his ds will be caught if his ds returns to sg for skipping ns. Even transit in sg is not allowed. Not sure did the family chg their citizenship but am sure his son did.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787454</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787454</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steadyberry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:44:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:34:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><br />The point is just that the PR boy is fully capable of depriving another citizen of a place in the Pri Sch.</blockquote></blockquote>That is an odd thought. PRs are long-term residents in Sg; 5-10 years at the very least. They work, pay taxes, contribute to keep the economy running. The idea that they are 'depriving' a citizen of anything is narrow-minded and unfair.<br /><br />In any case, this thread has gone way off-topic. I am not going to participate in this discussion anymore. Whatever your thoughts are on this matter, please keep them to yourself.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787441</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787441</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nansk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:34:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:33:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">If the mother and daughter converts…get priority to school. But to be fair, the son (if there is) should also be a SC to enjoy phase 1.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787440</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787440</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:33:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:43:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>nansk:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><p><br />Yes. The parent is one factor.<br /><br />And those with kids. After the mother convert, the female kid may convert also, while the male kid may remain as PR. And if the elder kid is a girl and convert, and got into a school of choice, the PR male younger brother will get into the Pri school also.</p></blockquote></blockquote>In either case, even if the male child remains as PR, he will have to serve NS.<br /><br />As for your point of \"school of choice\" why is it bad/wrong if the younger sibling gets into the same school?!  :scratchhead:<p></p></blockquote>I didn't say anything about bad or wrong..<br /><br />The point is just that the PR boy is fully capable of depriving another citizen of a place in the Pri Sch.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787408</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[limlim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:43:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:32:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><br />Yes. The parent is one factor.<br /><br />And those with kids. After the mother convert, the female kid may convert also, while the male kid may remain as PR. And if the elder kid is a girl and convert, and got into a school of choice, the PR male younger brother will get into the Pri school also.</blockquote></blockquote>In either case, even if the male child remains as PR, he will have to serve NS.<br /><br />As for your point of \"school of choice\" why is it bad/wrong if the younger sibling gets into the same school?!  :scratchhead:<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787404</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787404</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nansk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:32:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:29:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>limlim:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>nansk:</b><p><br />Are you aware that sons of PRs are also required to serve NS? And yet there are lots of parents of sons who:<br />1. apply for PR<br /><span style="\&quot;color:">2. continue to live/work in Sg even after their sons turn 12. </span><br /><br />That means, they are willing to let their sons serve NS - sons who may not go on to take Sg citizenship.<br /><br />So, what  you are implying is not necessarily true.</p></blockquote></blockquote>You point being? why 12 and not 18?<p></p></blockquote>I am not 100% sure on this point, but I was told by my PR friends that if the son gives up his PR status at age 12, then he does not need to serve NS. (But then he has to leave Sg forever; no chance of returning.) <br /><br />If he continues with his PR status beyond the age of 12, then he <i><i>has</i></i> to serve NS. Maybe if you search the Mindef/ICA web site you can get the specifics.<br />My point was, that there <i><i>are</i></i> PR parents who choose to let their sons serve NS.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787398</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/787398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nansk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:29:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:30:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I will be happy if and when MOE can get teachers to teach like before. Total dedication.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:30:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:57:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>buds:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><p>For a split second, I thought you wrote \"it could just be another <b><b>decade</b></b>..\"  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":laughing:" alt="😆" /> Not surprised if it is..</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />:rotflmao:<br /><br />Good one concern2! <a href="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php">http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php</a><p></p></blockquote>Ha! Thanks, buds!<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786532</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786532</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[concern2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:57:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">For a split second, I thought you wrote \"it could just be another <b><b>decade</b></b>..\"  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":laughing:" alt="😆" /> Not surprised if it is..</blockquote></blockquote><br />:rotflmao:<br /><br />Good one concern2! <a href="http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php">http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php</a><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786514</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[buds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:02:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>tuition_czar:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Just bear in mind: being heard not equals to implementation of suggestions. It could just be another charade.</blockquote></blockquote><br />For a split second, I thought you wrote \"it could just be another <b><b>decade</b></b>..\"  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":laughing:" alt="😆" /> Not surprised if it is..<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[concern2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:02:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are you happy you have been heard by MOE... on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:44:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>verykiasu2010:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>concern2:</b><p><br /><br />Does this mean that the son of a parent with a Singapore PR status, even if he is living in other countries (e.g. US), has to come back at the age of 16 to register for NS?</p></blockquote></blockquote>if the son of the SGP PR is also a PR, this PR son (born in SGP) must come back to SGP to serve NS regardless where he stays.  By law. No excuse<p></p></blockquote>if the son decided to give up the PR at 16.5yo?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786489</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/786489</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[limlim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:44:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>