chenlaoshi\" post_id=\"1968219\" time=\"1584984556\" user_id=\"162894:

And also, is there a possibility that there will be TWO or MORE possible answer for the moral lesson?

It is possible that there may be more than 1 principle involved (quite seldom though) but students should identify the main/most direct one (in relation to the story plot). One important step to take is to recap the incidents/main points from the entire passage before making a conclusion.

a. 丽明连续几天放学后都会擦板板，并得到老师的赞美 (paragraph 1, 2)
b. 老师不在课室+投选班长结束后，丽明态度完全改变 (paragraph 3, 4)
c. 香香原本去教员室，想把事实告诉老师但却“倒了回来”，把白板擦干净 (paragraph 5)

\"人不可貌相，要观察一个人不能光从一时的表面(现)来判断，要更仔细地观察\" would not cover in depth/point out directly point a+b's doing something for ulterior motive and point c's 香香's eventual decision to clean the whiteboard herself.

Lastly, since the change in format in 2017, questions regarding qualities/traits have been tested twice. Do ensure the kids know the common adjectives/characteristics well and know how to write them (if they have not already done so ).
https://i.imgur.com/ragA80O.jpg\">


【Chen Lao Shi's CL Weekly Classes (Pri & Sec Levels)】: https://chenlaoshi.wixsite.com/psleprepclass/class-schedule-details[/quote]I see...

but by stating \"don't judge people simply based on the action/surface, but instead take a longer/detailed observation\", this student will definitely get no mark in this case? I mean, it is also one of the moral lessons in this story, and also quite obvious, ain't it? The main characters also stated (quite explicitly) that she regretted trusting 丽明 too much, showing that it is a bad idea to judge someone too quickly on the mere surface and action.

Pand\" post_id=\"1904129\" time=\"1553763879\" user_id=\"137291:

The Math Note\" post_id=\"1904083\" time=\"1553742338\" user_id=\"176555:[quote=\"The Math Note\" post_id=1904083 time=1553742338 user_id=176555]0.034 rounded off to the nearest 0.01 is 0.03
0.025 rounded off to the nearest 0.01 is also 0.03

So anything between 0.025 and 0.034 rounded off to the nearest 0.01 is 0.03.

Hope that helps. 📏😊

Sorry, unfortunately, your answer is wrong. I am a math teacher and am aware of the confusion this question causes to people not familiar with bounds.

The cambridge solution to a similar question in the o level is same as mine. Unfortunately, only teachers have access to the report.[/quote]

Okay... I know this upper bound thing. BUT, how to convince the student into accepting it?

As in, some of the students can be quite stubborn and unwilling(and unamused) to accept this idea. Especially when the answer key in assessment book normally use the \"wrong\" upper bound(in this example, 0.034).

Regarding PSLE HCL Comprehension question(the last question, the open-ended question)

https://postimg.cc/4mdM4sgt
This kind of question is to ask student what kind of moral lesson（道理） is learnt from this story.
I will need to check with a few things:
1. Normally, the moral lesson is obvious from the last paragraph: Yes or no?
2. For the real-life example part, one can use the story in the passage with some adjustment. Yes or no?

And also, is there a possibility that there will be TWO or MORE possible answer for the moral lesson?

Like for example,

https://postimg.cc/2qbLCqHJ
https://postimg.cc/4mdM4sgt
https://postimg.cc/v1JgTQkm
According to the answer in the exam paper seller, it is using the info from the last paragraph to answer. It is understandable.

However, I do feel that another answer seems possible also: Something like \"人不可貌相，要观察一个人不能光从一时的表面来判断，要更仔细地观察\". The example used is something like \"结交新朋友时要小心，不能轻易相信，要仔细观察，以免被朋友欺骗\"(The reason for using such an answer is because the main character is tricked by the act of that faker into choosing her as the class monitor)

Is it a bad idea to answer like that?

I am curious about something.


How much harder is secondary CL, if compared to primary HCL? And in what way, if you can elaborate? Or is it more like just the difference in the way how the exam tests student?

比起小学高华，中学普华有多难？怎么个难法？还是更多是在考学生的方法不一样而已？

Sorry to hijack this thread, but I have a question that is always bugging me.


I know there are lots of Chinese assessment books in the market, but how about exam papers from other schools?

I know there are some secondary 4 Chinese exam papers(Be it for CL or HCL), then how about Secondary 1 - 3?

I am really curious about it. I mean, for other subjects(Maths and Science. English not much, but at least there are still some) in the non-graduating level(secondary 1~3), there are lots of past years papers from other schools for practice purpose. But for Chinese? it is basically none. Not to say the free resource from the internet: it is not even available from all those exam paper sellers.

So, is there any way to get the school papers for Chinese for S1~S3? I don’t mind buying also.

1) Subject: Chinese
2) Level: Secondary 1 ~ 3
3) Stream: Exp and NA are both fine

Sorry to hijack this thread, but I have a question that is always bugging me.


I know there are lots of Chinese assessment books in the market, but how about exam papers from other schools?

I know there are some secondary 4 Chinese exam papers(Be it for CL or HCL), then how about Secondary 1 - 3?

I am really curious about it. I mean, for other subjects(Maths and Science. English not much, but at least there are still some) in the non-graduating level(secondary 1~3), there are lots of past years papers from other schools for practice purpose. But for Chinese? it is basically none. Not to say the free resource from the internet: it is not even available from all those exam paper sellers.

So, is there any way to get the school papers for Chinese for S1~S3? I don’t mind buying also.