sophie80:
Learning is bilateral. special kids learn good behavior from normal kids. Normal kids could learn bad behavior from special kids.
I discovered this pretty late but I guess Seleste & Corrochan have covered various angles quite adequately so I will try not to repeat after them. Just wanted to chip in on my 2cents' worth.
With specific reference to what you had written above (quoted herewith), the fact that you jumped into conclusion that special needs kids learn \"good\" behaviour from normal kids is itself a glaring discrimination. Are you saying ALL normal kids display only GOOD behaviour? Similarly, again quoting you, \"normal kids learn bad behaviour from special needs kids\" seems to suggest that special needs children have only bad qualities. That is where you are unwise, ill-informed & myopic.
I have 2 children. One special needs; the other normal (just like your child). My special needs child greets all aunties & uncles he meets readily, which to me, is a good behaviour.... my normal child hates to greet people, no matter how hard I try to cajole him, which to me, is a \"bad\" behaviour I am still trying to correct. And like it or not, I am trying to get my normal child to use his special needs sibling as an example (in this aspect).
U r right. Learning is bilateral. While your child is normal, I do not believe she is \"perfect\". Kids will be kids, there will bound to be times where she displays bad behaviour... can we then say we are \"afraid our SN kids will learn this bad behaviour from your child?\" This wouldn't be a fair statement.
I believe this is where effective parenting comes into play. I won't criticise your parental style but to ostracize won't help. Your child will one day meet special needs people along the way, be it in her career or personal life, would you educate her to run away from such people or be equipped with the right mindset to handle the situation? Hypothetically again (just solely for the purpose of meaningful discussion - no offence please) - If she ever has a special needs child later on in her life, should she shirk the responsibility , shun the child or perhaps just dump the child with you (the grandmother) and run away from reality? Or should she be responsible enough to actively search for all ways to help her child integrate into society?
Besides, normal kids can be discerning if parents explain to them what is good & what is bad behaviour. So they should know what is good behaviour; given good parental guidance; since they are normal children with above-average cognitive ability (as opposed to special needs kids).
Being overly-protective won't help. Don't leave education solely in the hands of the school/teachers. Take an active stance. Educate your child yourself what is right behavior & what is wrong behaviour. Inclusion is key here, for, if you cannot embrace (embrace, not condone) bad behaviour as part of your teachings, she will not be able to grow up discerning coz her \"education or developmental milestone\" is skewed. Her education has been \"modified\" such that she can only see \"good things & never the bad; it has been \"modified\" such that it is not a true reflection of what she will see in reality eventually.
If you put her in a school with all neuro-typical (normal) kids, can you guarantee that she will not see other children \"misbehaving\" (or are you saying normal children won't fight, won't snatch)? In their teenage years, most teens would be curious to experiment with smoking or even with some nocturnal activities they shouldn't really be doing ... how are you going to \"protect\" her ... via proper education that includes talking about the topics openly or \"run away from the topic\" & evade talking about such topics altogether?
Inclusion is key. Diversity is paramount. Education encompasses both & more; not just mere academics.