NotEducatedMan\" post_id=\"1903331\" time=\"1553128203\" user_id=\"98110:

Grandyma\" post_id=\"1903318\" time=\"1553093921\" user_id=\"153793:

One doesnt need to be in IPJC inorder to achieve good results.
Nyjc though not IPJC , its Mean Rank Point is reported ranging from 83.1(by a forummer, reliable source as claimed) , is quite comparable to some IPJCs.

Just wondering what's the percentage of NYJC students taking 4H2

Let's say is 50% compare to all IPJC of 95-98% for example (only)
And let's say if put 95% instead of 50% of NYJC students take 4H2, will its Mean Rank Points drop to ie. 81-82 instead?

No offence. Just doubt only

Let's say if you can provide concrete facts, we can have a healthy discussion, rather than speculate on novels

stetan\" post_id=\"1903087\" time=\"1552914691\" user_id=\"3358:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901912\" time=\"1552070282\" user_id=\"140018:

I said it was \"comparable\". Stop evading my questions posed to you on this thread for I shall write it out clearly to you again:

Nonsense. You said better. Please re-read the NYJC thread to refresh your memory. Or you trying to pull another fast one again ?

mindays\" post_id=\"1901912\" time=\"1552070282\" user_id=\"140018:

1. Who are you to judge what top tier is? (And what do you mean by top-tier?) (How do you classify?)
2. Who are you to say what a heartland JC is? (What then do you mean by \"heartland\"? What indicators are you using?)

Top tier = elite.
Heartland = may be good but certainly not considered elite.

mindays\" post_id=\"1901912\" time=\"1552070282\" user_id=\"140018:

You are using NYJC's thread as a fig leaf to cover your cracks in this thread.

What kind of English statement is this ? Is this a new idiom you invented or is your English just fundamentally bad ?

Your answer is a joke.

What do you mean by \"top tier = elite\"? Might as well say water is wet. Care to elaborate? Also, you didn't justify WHO are you to judge? Same goes to your answer to heartland. If you dont understand your deed, you won't understand the language. I suggest you look up the Oxford Dictionary to assist your understanding of English. It also shows how shallow you are when you use such points to kick up a fuss. Shame on you

floppy\" post_id=\"1901919\" time=\"1552092626\" user_id=\"97579:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901910\" time=\"1552069453\" user_id=\"140018:

Look, if something is likely to be useful/true, people will upvote. Vice versa. Unlike Facebook/Twitter, you can't do the reverse. I guess you are not familiar with how other forums work.

I’m familiar with how other forums work. If something is in-line with what people like or believe in (ie they find agreeable in), it will be upvoted. However, upvote / downvote doesn’t make the initial statement any more true.

https://postimg.cc/rdjVJzg7

We all know that NYJC had never provided any info or data to substantiate what parents said or believe in, beyond the statement made by the P to an assembly (which isn't very helpful statistically speaking). While I understand the allure of proving a point, to present questionable data upvoted by the faceless men of Braavos as the bastion of truth is really

I do agree with your point. And thus, I sought forummers here to discuss or suggest interpretations when I posted a screenshot of the comment here: https://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=85535&start=850

stetan\" post_id=\"1901635\" time=\"1551922953\" user_id=\"3358:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901588\" time=\"1551882706\" user_id=\"140018:

Sardonic remark just shows how incapable and insinuating EJC parents are. Shameful :siam:

Sorry. I am not a EJC parent but you have just slam all EJC parents out there

Your DC is in one of the 3 feeder schools and I believe your DC is on the IP Track, that makes you a soon to be EJC parent. And, you slammed all EJC parents out there with your sardonic remark.

stetan\" post_id=\"1901633\" time=\"1551922718\" user_id=\"3358:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901585\" time=\"1551882087\" user_id=\"140018:

So you can't answer my question(s)? That is why you choose to go back to the old books when we have already closed the chapter. Let's call a spade a spade

I repeat again. These questions have been extensively discussed in the NYJC thread 2 years ago where you insisted that NYJC is a top JC having results that is better than DHS, VJC e.t.c.

Did you not you recall that you had utterly lost that argument, or have you already erased those painfu experiences from your memories ?

I said it was \"comparable\". Stop evading my questions posed to you on this thread for I shall write it out clearly to you again:

1. Who are you to judge what top tier is? (And what do you mean by top-tier?) (How do you classify?)
2. Who are you to say what a heartland JC is? (What then do you mean by \"heartland\"? What indicators are you using?)

You are using NYJC's thread as a fig leaf to cover your cracks in this thread.

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1901617\" time=\"1551919256\" user_id=\"17023:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901586\" time=\"1551882378\" user_id=\"140018:

[quote=lee_yl post_id=1901567 time=1551878297 user_id=17023]
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it can go by any other name but it is still a duck.

That is pure over generalisation and I hope not all EJC parents(?) are like you. Might as well say a goose is Donald Duck, waterfowl is Donald Duck, or even mihirungs. Unless you prove it is a duck, you should refrain from insisting it is a duck.

Sigh. Your over the top response is telling, really a case of 此地无银三百两[/quote]That's what you have to say when you can't prove Grandyma is me. Having duplicate accounts is a serious breach of rules and your accusation was an unjustified one.

floppy\" post_id=\"1901589\" time=\"1551883101\" user_id=\"97579:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901587\" time=\"1551882603\" user_id=\"140018:

Ok, if you have that to say, it means you have nothing to say. I will take the comment from reddit that was upvoted 8 times as \"wrong\"

Reddit? Upvoted?
That’s the new measurement of right / wrong. Seriously??!
We may as well compare Facebook likes or Twitter retweets.

Look, if something is likely to be useful/true, people will upvote. Vice versa. Unlike Facebook/Twitter, you can't do the reverse. I guess you are not familiar with how other forums work.

stetan\" post_id=\"1901571\" time=\"1551879489\" user_id=\"3358:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901557\" time=\"1551877010\" user_id=\"140018:

How do you explain this comment from this website then? It is an upvoted comment by the way. https://www.reddit.com/r/SGExams/comments/atjvxb/a_levels_average_rp_of_jcs_across_sg/
https://postimg.cc/xXhVJ1Jv

The teacher was Grandyma/Mindays ? If not, must be fake news

Sardonic remark just shows how incapable and insinuating EJC parents are. Shameful :siam:

floppy\" post_id=\"1901570\" time=\"1551879150\" user_id=\"97579:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901557\" time=\"1551877010\" user_id=\"140018:

How do you explain this comment from this website then? It is an upvoted comment by the way. https://www.reddit.com/r/SGExams/comments/atjvxb/a_levels_average_rp_of_jcs_across_sg/
https://postimg.cc/xXhVJ1Jv

Explain?
How a teacher can be so wrong? Sure. Cos the teacher is actually a Chinese language teacher who last contact with statistics was over 30 years ago.

Ok, if you have that to say, it means you have nothing to say. I will take the comment from reddit that was upvoted 8 times as \"wrong\"

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1901567\" time=\"1551878297\" user_id=\"17023:

mindays\" post_id=\"1901562\" time=\"1551877516\" user_id=\"140018:

[quote=lee_yl post_id=1901555 time=1551876561 user_id=17023]
Are you threatening me? Derogatory attitude towards what? You?

What is your intention when you said \"just use Grandyma all the way lah\"? Obviously kicking a bucket of water and saying why is the water spilled :evil:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it can go by any other name but it is still a duck.[/quote]That is pure over generalisation and I hope not all EJC parents(?) are like you. Might as well say a goose is Donald Duck, waterfowl is Donald Duck, or even mihirungs. Unless you prove it is a duck, you should refrain from insisting it is a duck.