ZJMummy:XEK3:Hi, comparing Hua Cheng and its neighbough \"Xuelin\" at Bukit Timah, which is better?
Hi XEK3, it is pretty hard to give a quick answer of which one is better by simply comparison.
It is actually depended on many factors to draw a conclusion and different people with various preferences may lead to completely different results. I was ever in the same dilemma when trying to sign up one of the centres for my P5 son, as these two seems more popular around my place. Thus, I collected info by personal visit and feedbacks of my friens who had experience in the both centres.
Some people may had the same difficulty as me to make choice btw these two centres when going to the Bukit Timh plaza looking for chinese enrichment programmes. It is not only because of their same location, also because they are operating in some ways in common:
1) They both have good teaching materials well designed to boost learning interesting and in-depth practices for foundation build-up.
2) They are same in small size classes (normally less than 8).
3) Their teachers are nice and caring with motivated way of teaching as well as well education backgrounds, are trained and familiar to MOE syllabus.
4) They provide all range of chinese enrichment programmes from k1 to Sec students
Of course, there are also quite a lot different areas.
Although both of them applying newspaper cutting approaches, unlike XL using newspaper articles for all levels even k1s, Huacheng is more on encouraging upper primary students to embrace it as reading supplementary material. They said that this approach is not suitable for lower primary as they are still too young who required more firm foundation work and further brain development in order to better understand, and they are still in the age to be lured by colourful pictures and fairytale stories and get motivated by role playing games. Otherwise, it may spoil their potential interest in reading Chinese if it is too early overrun. My friend's k2 gal quitted from XL because she was afraid and quite resistant to join newspaper readings. Huacheng's AppleTree approach is quite appreciated for effective way of motivating lower primary and preschool students.
Another important factor for making decision is the flexibility of registration and makeup lesson option. There is a little difference here, XL doesn't have trial lesson available for first registration while HuaCheng allows to give four trial lessons before parents make final decision. If parents drop the lesson after trial, there is no registration fees charged.
However, both of them give free makeup lessons in kind and flexible manners. Unlike some centres they won't give makeup lesson unless medical certification is present for sick for example. My DS is P5, he sometimes had to take makeup lessons for his missing ones as unexpected activities happened in school.
As to the most important criteria to choose a centre is the quality and proven results. The comments of quality maybe varied from one to another, but the proven results may give more concrete hints. As far as I know, Hua Cheng had a longer history of being recognized as an established brand in Chinese enrichment for more than ten years. Same as its sister company Learning Point which is famous in english enrichment, some people comment that their ways of teaching may be too drilled and result-oriented with much stress especailly for upper primary. However, its results turned to be promising with almost 100% scored A & A* in 2011 PSLE. For XL, although hasn't shown much more outstanding results as still quite new with shorter history, it is getting more popular recently with their colourful teaching materials and some fresh teaching approaches like newspaper cuttings. It may be more welcomed for lower primary and pre-school students.
The last and the most crutial factor is the course fees. XL has no much competitive advantage over its neightbour. XL charges about $550 for 11 lessons per term while HC charge about $350 for 11 lessons. From only cost perspective, it seems obvious which one to be chosen. But as I mentioned it should be the one with better cost-effective outcome, so you may want to check your own needs first before you decide
Hope above info will help you make right decision which just fits for your own needs. :xedfingers:
Hi,
Just like to share my experience and alternative view.
I have sent my DD to XL when she was in K1 and now she is going to be promoted to P1 next year. During this period, we have seen a vast improvement in her Chinese language, in term of words recognition, sentence construction and reading interest in Chinese. Even, her child care teacher is impressed with her and she is chosen to be the narrator for her speech n drama graduation concert. (cos when in n1/n2 she disliked chinese so much that she did not want to communicate using it). Just last week, my DD even corrected my Chinese by writing out the correct character. So embarrassing.

Initially, I am also doubtful with the newspaper cuttings approach. I am worried it will have adverse effect by deterring her interest. However, it is not the case, my DD enjoyed them and it also encouraged her to want to read n learn about the content of the articles. E.g after the class she will ask me “do you know etc etc?” citing from the newspaper article and proudly tell me about it. At home, she will also pick up English/chinese newspapers and read.
Therefore, I strongly felt that this approach is suitable for preschoolers. They do not just learn the language but they are aware of the current events that are happening and cultivate their interest n quest in reading.
Yes, XL is still a new establishment without long history. But as I have mingled with other XL’s parents, they are delighted with their school’s results of their dd/ds.
XL price is definitely much higher in comparison. If measuring cost effectiveness can determine which centre is good? 一份钱一份货吧...
Overall, the content and teachers are very crucial.