Are you ready for 7 million people on tiny Singapore?
-
dolphinsiah:
Hi,Fairy:
[quote=\"dolphinsiah\"]
![](\"http://i47.tinypic.com/24fh937.jpg\")
http://i47.tinypic.com/24fh937.jpg\">
No! No! I am not ready...by then maybe I am already hand in my IC.... :censored:
good that you have this option...'to hand in your IC'.
Our welll paid policy makers, including their offspring will also have this option. If things doesnt work out in SG, they are in a position to escape, after reaping the rewards of the so-called economic benefits of the population growth policy. :siam: However, the majority of us will be stuck here....left to face the consequence..to suffer... :imdrowning: :mad: :stompfeet: :frustrated:
When I mentioned \"hand in IC\" means died already.... :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
The Police station will punch 2 holes in my ICs and issue a death certificate...
I no eyes see..... :faint:[/quote]Oh..i thought you meant giving up your citizenship. -
Fairy:
Actually, many MPs are multi-taskers with numerous directorship or interest in various business is it not?3Boys:
You know, I'm not cynical about their intentions. The MIW crafting these policies will unlikely personally benefit much from it, as they will be deep into their 70s/80s by the time it comes around.
Really?
The supposed economic benefits equals GDP growth which will translate into fat bonuses for those whose financial rewards are tied to GDP growth? -
Fairy:
Hmmm...by then all the MAJOR SHARE HOLDERS will have the fattest pockets..3Boys:
You know, I'm not cynical about their intentions. The MIW crafting these policies will unlikely personally benefit much from it, as they will be deep into their 70s/80s by the time it comes around.
Really?
The supposed economic benefits equals GDP growth which will translate into fat bonuses for those whose financial rewards are tied to GDP growth?
while, possibly, the mass and mess will be in the hands of the oppositions to deal with.. And there will be a reason for MAJOR SHARE HOLDERS to confirm that they are not so stupid..
-
Singapore Future MRT ...coming near your house and working place.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgDxPxwbX8w][/youtube] -
when Singapore reach 6.9 million...everybody go under the sea....
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-gq5aCqqmA][/youtube] -
WeiHan:
Since the cost of land in Singapore is so much higher now relative to construction cost, I'll suggest, from now onward, all roads be build underground, old roads can gradually be converted to underground also. All new MRT lines should be build underground. It frees up space and reduce much noise pollution above ground level.
That will be expensive and our income tax will be increased! :lightrod: -
concern2:
By then, what is p-parliamenen power compared to the power of capital? Why not the possibility of Nuclear Power? It might just be the reason the existing power plants are sold off. When the politicians have to 'kowtow' to the 'businessmen' - Well, the answer will be - \"you people asked for it, didn't you? You voted for the oppositions to voice out for you mah! Heheheh! \"
Hmmm...by then all the MAJOR SHARE HOLDERS will have the fattest pockets.. while, possibly, the mass and mess will be in the hands of the oppositions to deal with.. And there will be a reason for MAJOR SHARE HOLDERS to confirm that they are not so stupid..
Disclaimer: The above is fiction. Don't believe a word I say!
-
Fairy:
Sorry, I'm not getting drawn into that debate. I'm a reasonably analytical guy, and I believe this to be true. Even the WP have said that the PAP have the interest of the nation at heart, so I have very little time for cynical views in this regard. You are of course, free to form your own view.3Boys:
You know, I'm not cynical about their intentions. The MIW crafting these policies will unlikely personally benefit much from it, as they will be deep into their 70s/80s by the time it comes around.
Really?
The supposed economic benefits equals GDP growth which will translate into fat bonuses for those whose financial rewards are tied to GDP growth? -
The question we should be asking is not why our policy makers are embarking on what appears to be a population ponzi scheme for the sake of economic growth.
The question we should be asking is what will we have our policy makers do in the face of other people (ie. our neighbours and the other economic powers whether international or regional) embarking on what appears to be a population ponzi scheme for the sake of their economic growth. If not this, then what? -
octoberbaby:
Good that now PRs can't rent out their HDB flats :rahrah:
She came her, few mths later, bought HDB 4 room flat. Few months later she rent a master-bed room in condo. Rent out her 4-rm flat. She is a study-mama, husband doing china business.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login