KTKS:mindays:Crester, is this the post you are referring to? http://xinminsec.moe.edu.sg/xss/highlights/former-students-of-xinmin-secondary-done-well-in-2016-a-level-examinations
This looks like a solid piece of evidence that a non-IP school can also produce students with excellent results, especially if it value-adds. Congrats to these graduants :congrats:
Congrats to XSS former students who had done well in their A levels.
Although the distinctions listed are a combination of both H1 and H2 subjects, all the pupils should be lauded for their tremendous effort put in. XSS is certainly proud to have instilled the value of conscientiousness in continual learning among its pupils.
It seems like the bulk of the top pupils of XSS had chosen NYJC, maybe due to proximity. XSS has a small pool of PRC and Asean scholars and I can relate some names from the list.
This post I read and need to comment about you.
What's your actual purpose of yr message here.
2nd paragraph- 'ALTHOUGH' the word you used.
Yes, distinctions listed can be both H1 n H2, you need not highlight this fact. Just
congratulate the pupils will do.
3rd paragraph- 'Top pupils of XSS had chosen NYJC maybe due to proximity'.
What makes you so sure is this reason they chose NYJC? Why don't you mention
pupils chose NYJC due to its academic standard as well. Don't assume it's
proximity reason and keeps stressing it. If want to say, say maybe due to proximity
and NYJC standard.
- how you so sure some names are PRC and Asean scholars?Assume again.
- what's wrong with PRC and Asean scholars? Don't discriminate though you didn't
comment about them but don't need bring them in your post.
Be gracious and just say XSS and NYJC have taught these Top pupils well.
You are that kind of person people always say \"double faces\"- say something yet have double meaning in your words.
I finished my saying. Don't want to discuss more.